Jokes

Laughter All The Way….

FACT : Real History of Taj-Mahal

Posted by @ B H i on January 21, 2007

It is proved Taj Mahal is not a burial of Mumtaj but an ancient temple of Lord Shiva. Sufficient proofs and website links are with this mail.

U can try this link (text and photo) before/after going through this mail:

http://www.stephen-knapp.com/was_the_taj_mahal_a_vedic_temple.htm

“The Mogul Emperor Shah Jahan in the memory of his wife Mumtaz Mahal built the Taj Mahal. It was built in 22 years (1631 to 1653) by 20,000 artisans brought to India from all over the world! Many people believe Ustad Isa of Iran designed it.” This is what your guide probably told you if you ever visited the Taj Mahal. This is the same story I read in my history book as a student.

NOW READ THIS…….

No one has ever challenged it except Prof. P. N. Oak, who believes the whole world has been duped. In his book Taj Mahal: The True Story, Oak says the Taj Mahal is not Queen Mumtaz’s tomb but an ancient Hindu temple palace of Lord Shiva (then known as Tejo Mahalaya). In the course of his research Oak discovered that the Shiva temple palace was usurped by Shah Jahan from then Maharaja of Jaipur, Jai Singh. In his own court chronicle, Badshahnama, Shah Jahan admits that an exceptionally beautiful grand mansion in Agra was taken from Jai Singh for Mumtaz’s burial. The ex-Maharaja of Jaipur still retains in his secret collection two orders from Shah Jahan for surrendering the Taj building. Using captured temples and mansions, as a burial place for dead courtiers and royalty was a common practice among Muslim rulers.

For example, Humayun, Akbar, Etmud-ud-Daula and Safdarjung are all buried in such mansions. Oak’s inquiries began with the name of Taj Mahal. He says the term “Mahal” has never been used for a building in any Muslim countries from Afghanistan to Algeria. “The unusual explanation that the term Taj Mahal derives from Mumtaz Mahal was illogical in at least two respects.
Firstly, her name was never Mumtaz Mahal but Mumtaz-ul-Zamani,” he writes. Secondly, one cannot omit the first three letters ‘Mum’ from a woman’s name to derive the remainder as the name for the building. “Taj Mahal, he claims, is a corrupt version of Tejo Mahalaya, or Lord Shiva’s Palace.

Oak also says the love story of Mumtaz and Shah Jahan is a fairy tale created by court sycophants, blundering historians and sloppy archaeologists. Not a single royal chronicle of Shah Jahan’s time corroborates the love story.

Furthermore, Oak cites several documents suggesting the Taj Mahal predates Shah Jahan’s era, and was a temple dedicated to Shiva, worshipped by Rajput’s of Agra city. For example, Prof. Marvin Miller of New York took a few samples from the riverside doorway of the Taj. Carbon dating tests revealed that the door was 300 years older than Shah Jahan. European traveler Johan Albert Mandelslo, who visited Agra in 1638 (only seven years after Mumtaz’s death), describes the life of the city in his memoirs. But he makes no reference to the Taj Mahal being built. The writings of Peter Mundy, an English visitor to Agra within a year of Mumtaz’s death, also
suggest the Taj was a noteworthy building well before Shah Jahan’s time.

Prof. Oak points out a number of design and architectural inconsistencies that support the belief of the Taj Mahal being a typical Hindu temple rather than a mausoleum.

Many rooms in the Taj! Mahal have remained sealed since Shah Jahan’s time and are still inaccessible to the public. Oak asserts they contain a headless statue of Lord Shiva and other objects commonly used for worship rituals in Hindu temples. Fearing political backlash, Indira Gandhi’s government tried to have Prof. Oak’s book withdrawn from the bookstores, and threatened the Indian publisher of the first edition dire consequences.

There is only one way to discredit or validate Oak’s research. The current government should open the sealed rooms of the Taj Mahal under U.N. supervision, and let international experts investigate.

Do circulate this to all you know and let them know about this reality…..

Hey please check this link ……..it adds as a visual proof ………

http://www.stephen-knapp.com/was_the_taj_mahal_a_vedic_temple.htm

If u don’t believe the article above, and have faith upon BBC, please
visit their website in this link:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/h2g2/alabaster/A5220

10 Responses to “FACT : Real History of Taj-Mahal”

  1. dare said

    this is BS

  2. Jaivardhan said

    this might be or might not be true

  3. priyank said

    wohhhhhhhhhhhhhh. if this ever happened, shah jahan had to be punished again in hell

  4. priya said

    what a story .its a mind blowing story .
    lover ho to shah jahan ki tarah varna bekar hai lover

  5. priya said

    love is like a challenge face it

  6. ravi said

    Wowwww¡!!!!!!!
    I truly believe this.there are many such distortions of indian greatness.
    I wish anybody could tell this to anna hazare or ramadev baba who could instigate the government to check the sealed doors.
    That deceptive.. ………..shahjahan must be punished in hell and his soul shall ever forever retain in abyss of dark hell.

    • ashley said

      oh my gosh! this is too much to read and i wonder if this stuff is even right facts on it. im reall tired and i want more facts on taj mahal!!!Give Me Mor(:

  7. asad said

    whatever it is man, temple or mosque or tomb. its pretty and is one of the wonders of the world. chill out and stop the whining.

  8. ANAND PANWAR said

    The taj built the shahjhan in 1931 the memory of mumtaj

  9. ANAND PANWAR said

    This might be or might not be true

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: